Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45995 (KAR)

SMT. RATHNAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1921/2026 · 2026-01-27

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4364 WP No. 1921 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 1921 OF 2026 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. RATHNAMMA D/O LATE NARASINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT MANCHANAYAKANAHALLI, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGAR TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT. 2. SRI. BYATE MURTHY S/O LATE NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT MANCHANAYAKANAHALLI, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGAR TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJU S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560 001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL, RAMANAGAR TALUK, RAMANAGAR, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4364 WP No. 1921 of 2026 3. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMANAGAR TALUK, RAMANAGAR BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE 2ND RESPONDENT-LAND TRIBUNAL, RAMANAGAR TALUK, BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS VIDE ANNEXURE K AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that when the petitioners sought for mutation entries in the revenue records in terms of the orders passed by the Land Tribunal, Ramanagar Taluk, in proceedings bearing No.LRF (Q) 32/1981-82 dated 15.03.1982, it was observed that - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4364 WP No. 1921 of 2026 there is a mistake in the order of the Land Tribunal. Instead of granting Occupancy Rights to Sri Narasingaiah to an extent of *1 acre 1 gunta in Sy.No.1 of Manchanayakanahalli, it was wrongly shown as 1 acre in *Sy.No.62 of Manchanayakanahalli and instead of granting Occupancy Rights to Sri Narasimaiah to an extent of 1 acre of land in Sy.No.1 of Manchanayakanahalli it was wrongly shown as 1 acre in Sy.No.62 of *Manchanayakanahalli. 3. In that view of the matter, the petitioners have filed an application before the Land Tribunal, Ramanagar Taluk, on 18.10.2025 at Annexure ‘K’. However, till date no orders are passed by the Land Tribunal and therefore, the prayer in this writ petition is to direct the Land Tribunal, Ramanagar Taluk, to rectify the mistake while considering the application filed by the petitioners. 4. Having regard to the innocuous prayer made by the petitioners, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the second respondent-Land Tribunal, Ramanagar Taluk, to consider the application for *Corrected vide Court Order dated 12.02.2026 - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4364 WP No. 1921 of 2026 rectification filed by the petitioners and pass necessary orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT: JL