A-38 Ct No.16 05.10.2026 TN FMAT 403 of 2026 IA No: CAN 1 of 2026 CAN 2 of 2026 Indian Bank Vs. Ritspin Synthetics Limited and another Ms. Antalina Guha, Ms. Ashmita Lohia, Ms. Sweta Burman .... for the appellant Mr. A. Alim, Mr. Sumit Biswas, Ms. Rajashree Bhowmick .... for the respondents [ 1. It is rightly pointed out by learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the appeal is valued at Rs.60,100/- and, as such, is not maintainable before this Court. 2. There is substance in such contention. 3. Accordingly, FMAT 403 of 2026 is dismissed as not maintainable before this Court on the ground of pecuniary jurisdiction, with liberty to the appellant to prefer an appeal on the self-same grounds against the self-same order before the appropriate court having pecuniary jurisdiction. 4. The learned Advocate-on-record for the appellant shall be at liberty to take back the certified copy of the impugned order, upon furnishing a photocopy thereof, from the concerned department of this Court. 5. CAN 1 of 2026 and CAN 2 of 2026 are disposed of consequentially. 2 6. There will be no order as to costs. 7. It is made clear that the merits of the matter have not been gone into by this Court. 8. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities. (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.) (Sandip Kumar De, J.)