1 / 6 ORDER SHEET WBCHCA0048422024 Ct. No.1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item Nos.D/L.18-34 CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION PG APPELLATE SIDE WP. CT / 36 /202 4 UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER, EASTERN RAILWAY ]Petitioner Versus MD. ISMAIL ] Respondent with WP. CT / 100 /202 4 CHINMAY SARMA ]Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 102 /202 4 BUDDHADEB SADHUKHAN ]Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 135 /202 4 RADHESHYAM PAL ] Petitioner Versus 2 / 6 UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ] Respondents with WP. CT / 150 /202 4 PAWAN KUMAR BURNWAL ]Petitioner Versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 69 /202 4 MD. ISMAIL ]Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 81 /202 4 ABDUL MALEK ]Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 82 /202 4 RAJIV KUMAR THAKUR ]Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 83 /202 4 ANIMESH ADHIKARY ] Petitioner Versus 3 / 6 UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 84 /202 4 MD. HUSSAIN ] Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 85 /202 4 SANCHITA ADHIKARY ] Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ] Respondents with WP. CT / 88 /202 4 SANGITA MISTRY ] Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 89 /202 4 RAHUL GHOSH ]Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 92 /202 4 AJOY PAUL ] Petitioner 4 / 6 Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 93 /202 4 BIPLAB GHOSH ]Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 95 /202 4 KRISHNA KAMAL SARKAR ] Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents with WP. CT / 97 /202 4 RAJ KUMAR RAJ ]Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ]Respondents Appearance: Mr. Kumar Jyoti Tewari, Sr. Adv. Ms. Amrita Pandey, Advocates…... For the Petitioner/Union of India in WP.CT. 36 of 2024 & For the Respondents (WP.CT. 100 of 2024, WP.CT. 102 of 2024, WP.CT. 135 of 2024, 5 / 6 WP.CT. 150 of 2024, WP.CT 69 of 2024, WP.CT. 81 of 2024, WP.CT. 82 of 2024, WP.CT. 83 of 2024, WP.CT. 84 of 2024, WP.CT. 85 of 2024, WP.CT. 88 of 2024, WP.CT. 89 of 2024, WP.CT. 92 of 2024, WP.CT. 93 of 2024, WP.CT. 95 of 2024, WP.CT. 97 of 2024 Mr. Ujjal Ray, Mr. Binit Kumar, Advocates for the Respondents in WP.CT. 36 of 2024 for the Petitioner(s) in WP.CT. 100 of 2024, WP.CT. 102 of 2024, WP.CT. 135 of 2024, WP.CT. 150 of 2024, WP.CT 69 of 2024, WP.CT. 81 of 2024, WP.CT. 82 of 2024, WP.CT. 83 of 2024, WP.CT. 84 of 2024, WP.CT. 85 of 2024, WP.CT. 88 of 2024, WP.CT. 89 of 2024, WP.CT. 92 of 2024, WP.CT. 93 of 2024, WP.CT. 95 of 2024, WP.CT. 97 of 2024. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, CJ. & OM NARAYAN RAI, J. DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026. ORDER (Per Court) 1. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Union of India indicates that the Petition preferred by the Union of India, is listed at Serial No. 18 (WP.CT. 36 of 2024). 6 / 6 2. The learned Counsel representing the individual workmen, whose Petitions are listed from Serial No. 19 to 34, submits that the Petitioners are persons, who are involved in the same selection process. 3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Union of India and the learned Counsel for the individual Petitioners jointly submit that their submissions and contentions are covered and answered by a Judgment delivered by this Court on 23rd September, 2026 in WP.CT. 49 of 2022 (The Union of India & Ors. vs. Babloo Kumar & Ors.). They submit that all these Petitions can be disposed off in view of the analysis and conclusions drawn by this Court in the Judgment delivered in Babloo Kumar (supra). 4. As such, considering the identical aspect in these matters and in the batch of cases decided by this Court in Babloo Kumar (supra), all these Petitions stand disposed off, for the reasons recorded in the Judgment in Babloo Kumar (supra). Pending Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed off. (Om Narayan Rai, J.) (Ravindra V. Ghuge) Chief Justice