D/L.34. October 01, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 661 of 1993 Ramesh Chandra Dutta Vs. Nirmalh Chandra Dutta None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the appellant had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. It appears from the records that the defects pointed out by the Department as far back as in 3 June, 1993 have not been cured. In view of the above, FAT 661 of 1993 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Atarup Banerjee, J.)