Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45969 (MAD)

Justin Raj v. The State of Tamilnadu

WP Crl.(MD)/3577/2026 · 2026-07-03

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3577 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3577 of 2026 Justin Raj ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District At Nagarcoil. 2. Inspector of Police, Kaliyakkavilai Police Station, Kanyakumari District. 3. Manager, Manoj Auto Consulting & Finance Agent, Vettuvenni, Marthandam Post, Kanyakumari District. 4. M.Manoj, Proprietor of Manoj Auto Consulting & Finance Agent, Manoj Auto Consulting & Finance Agent, Vettuvenni, Marthandam Post, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to take action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 29.05.2025 within a stipulated period that may be fixed by this Court. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3577 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Susikumar (R1 & R2) Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 2nd respondent to take action on the complaint of the petitioner dated 29.05.2025 within a stipulated period that may be fixed by this Court. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had lodged a complaint against the third and fourth respondents seeking appropriate action against them for their refusal to return a blank cheque, which they were allegedly retaining under the guise that the petitioner had borrowed money from them. However, no proper action was taken, and therefore, this petition was filed. 3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that the enquiry is pending. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3577 of 2026 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the private respondents, notice to them is dispensed with. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the second respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 29.05.2025 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 03.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sm TO:- 1. The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District At Nagarcoil. 2. Inspector of Police, Kaliyakkavilai Police Station, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3577 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm Order made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3577 of 2026 Dated 03.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis