Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1083 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1083 of 2026 P.Ayyappan ... Petitioner/Appellant/Accused Vs. M.Sakthivel ... Respondent/Respondent/Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 BNSS, to call for the records relating to the Judgment dated 13.08.2025 passed in Crl.A.No.31 of 2022 on the file of the Learned Principal Sessions Judge, Theni confirming the order dated 25.02.2022 passed in S.T.C.No. 125 of 2021 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court (ML) at Theni and set aside the same by allowing this criminal revision petition. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kaviarasan For Respondent : Mr.K.Mohandass ORDER This Criminal Revision Case has been filed, assailing the judgment 1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1083 of 2026 in Crl.A.No.31 of 2022 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Theni, dated 13.08.2025, confirming the judgment dated 25.02.2022 in S.T.C.No. 125 of 2021 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court (ML) at Theni and acquit the accused. 2. The case of the respondent/complainant is that the petitioner borrowed a loan of Rs.2,50,000/- from the respondent and had issued a cheque bearing no.772436 dated 04.11.2019. The respondent had presented the cheque for encashment on 08.11.2019. However, the same was returned with an endorsement as “Funds insufficient”. Hence, the respondent had issued a legal notice on 02.12.2019 to the petitioner. The petitioner issued a reply notice with false information. Therefore, the respondent has filed a private complaint for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the petitioner. 3. The complaint was taken on file by the learned Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court (ML) at Theni, as S.T.C.No. 125 of 2021. The learned Trial Court convicted the petitioner on 25.02.2022, for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1083 of 2026 sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of five months and to pay the cheque amount of Rs.2,50,000/- with an interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of dishonour to the respondent within a period of two months, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month. Challenging the above said conviction and sentence, the petitioner has filed an appeal in Crl.A.No.31 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Theni and the Principal Sessions Judge, Theni, by confirming the conviction and sentence, dismissed the appeal. Being dissatisfied with the dismissal of the appeal, the petitioner has preferred the present Criminal Revision Case. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the both the parties have entered into compromise and filed a joint compromise memo to compound the offence. The scanned copy of the joint compromise memo is as follows:- 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1083 of 2026 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1083 of 2026 5. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent also confirms the fact that the compromise have been entered into between the parties. 6. Heard both sides and carefully perused the materials available on record. 7. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ramgopal and another v. State of Madhya Pradesh1, had held that this Court, in exercise of inherent powers, can accept the compromise, even in the case of non- compoundable offences, if the parties have entered into a compromise and the dispute is private in nature. 8. Though the petitioner is the accused of the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, the dispute is private in nature. Hence, this Court is inclined to accept the compromise and set aside the order of conviction and sentence imposed by the trial Court. 1 (2022) 14 SCC 531 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1083 of 2026 9. Accordingly, the Compromise memo dated 03.07.2026, is taken on file. The Criminal Revision Case is allowed in terms of the Compromise Memo dated 03.07.2026. The conviction and sentence imposed upon the petitioner vide judgment dated 13.08.2025 in Crl.A.No.31 of 2022 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Theni, confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the judgment dated 25.02.2022 in S.T.C.No.125 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court (ML) at Theni, is set aside and the petitioner is acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. 03.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No gbg Note : Issue order copy on 07.07.2026. To 1.The Principal Sessions Judge, Theni. 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1083 of 2026 2.The Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court (ML), Theni. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1083 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI ,J. gbg Order made in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1083 of 2026 Dated: 03.07.2026 8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis