Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45944 (KAR)

SBI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. BHANUMATHI

WP/1936/2025 · 2026-01-31

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5426 WP No. 1936 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1936 OF 2025 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: SBI GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., DIVISIONAL MANAGER DIVISIONAL OFFICE SHOP NO.4 AND 5, 1ST FLOOR, INLAND ORNATE, NAVABHARATH CIRCLE, MANGALORE TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT, NOW REP BY SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., 3/1, PLATFORM ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU NOW REP BY SBI GIC LTD., 1ST FLOOR, RUKMINI TOWERS, PLATFORM ROAD, NEAR MANTRI MALL, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560020 Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5426 WP No. 1936 of 2025 REP. BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER COMPANY IS REGISTERED UNDER COMPANY ACT 1956. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRADEEP B.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BHANUMATHI D/O NANGU KORAG AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, D.NO. 4-3 BLOCK NO.4, SUBODINI PRATHAMIKA SCHOOL HATTIRA, ALEVOOR UDUPI DISTRICT. 2. VEENA MELANTA W/O K GANESH MELANTA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, D.NO. KT-3-54 1, VIGNESH, AMBADI, KOTE VILLAGE, KATAPADY, KAUP TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER AS PER ANNEXURE-F DATED 27-02-2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5426 WP No. 1936 of 2025 ADD.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDL. MACT, UDUPI ON REJECT THE IA NO.3/2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 OF CPC READ WITH SECTION 166 (3) (AMENDMENT ACT 2019) AS PER ANNEXURE D IN MVC NO.836/2023. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner, arguing in support of dismissal of the petition, submits that in terms of the memo the parties have settled their dispute in the Lok Adalath. The memo reads as under: "The petitioner is herewith filing the Memo for withdrawal of Petition as not pressed, in the interest of justice and equity." - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5426 WP No. 1936 of 2025 As such, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE SA ct:sr