- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1547-DB WP No. 9230 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION No. 9230 OF 2018 (S-KAT) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LEELAVATHI T., W/O K. B. THIMMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BALAJI NIVAS(SIDDHI-BUDDHI), 2ND CROSS, 'SOOFA', BEHIND SAPTHAGIRI COLLEGE, TUMAKURU-572102. 2. SRI LAKSHMINARAYANA D., S/O DEVENDRAPPA, #77, SRI GANESHA, GANDHI BAZAR, SHIVAMOGGA-577202. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. LEELAVATHI T., PARTY-IN-PERSON SRI LAKSHMINARAYAN D., PARTY-IN-PERSON) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, D. P. A. R., VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by VALLI MARIMUTHU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1547-DB WP No. 9230 of 2018 2. THE KARNATAKA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, UDYOG SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.R. RAJENDRA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO BY ALL AVERMENTS OF FACTS FROM TWELVE YEARS HON'BLE TRIBUNAL HAS SUPPRESSED MY FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AGAINST NATURAL JUSTICE, OVER RULED PREVIOUS ORDERS OF THE SAME COURT, WITH "'MES'S REA" AND BIASED AND MALAFIDE INTENSION. EVEN THOUGH BY DISPOSING MORE THAN SIXTY APPLICATIONS THOUGH THE PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION WAS RUNNING IN HON'BLE HIGH COURT AND SOME RESPONDENT APPROACHED HON'BLE APEX COURT IN PREVIOUS YEARS, WHERE I BROUGHT TWO MANDAMUS FROM THIS HON'BLE HIGH COURT ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Both the petitioners (party-in-persons) i.e., Smt.Leelavathi T., and Sri. Lakshminarayan D., are present before the Court. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1547-DB WP No. 9230 of 2018 2. Both the petitioners have filed separate memo dated 08.01.2026 and 12.01.2026 seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Though certain averments have been made in the memorandum of withdrawal, they submit that they may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition, unconditionally. 4. The submissions of the party-in-persons are placed on record along with their memos. 5. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE SD/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1