Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45912 (MAD)

Kumaravel v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by

CRL MP(MD)/11806/2026 · 2026-06-29

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL MP(MD).Nos.11806 & 11808 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 29.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL MP(MD).Nos.11806 & 11808 of 2026 in CRL OP(MD).No.9973 of 2026 1.Kumaravel 2.M.Balaji 3.Bampaiyammal 4.Kanjana Devi 5.Thennarasi 6.Sangeetha 7.C.Arunkumar 8.M.Alagu 9.M.Vasanth 10.Kathir Prasath 11.Lakshmi 12.Deepak 13.Karthikkanna ...Petitioners in both petitions Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, M.Chathirapatti Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.54 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant in both petitions For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunkumar Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.Vetrivel Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD).Nos.11806 & 11808 of 2026 PRAYER :- Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Act, 2023, to modify the condition (B) imposed by this Court in Crl.OP(MD).No.9973 of 2026 dated 27.05.2026 instead of signing before the respondent police and to grant an extension of time in order made in Crl.OP(MD).No.9973 of 2026 dated 27.05.2026 on the file of this court. COMMON ORDER : The Court made the following order :- These petitions have been filed by the petitioners to modify the condition (B) imposed by this Court in Crl.OP(MD).No.9973 of 2026 dated 27.05.2026 instead of signing before the respondent police and to extend the time for execution of sureties. 2.By the order dated 02.06.2026 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.9973 of 2026, this Court vide condition 6(b), this Court passed the following order: “6(b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;..” 3.This Court not satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions to modify the above said condition. Hence, this Court is not inclined to modify the above said condition. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD).Nos.11806 & 11808 of 2026 4.Accordingly, Crl.M.P.(MD).No.11806 of 2026 stands dismissed. 5.However, the time for execution of sureties is extended for a period of one weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The other conditions remain unchanged. Accordingly, Crl.M.P.(MD).No.11808 of 2026 stands ordered. (K R S J) 29.06.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.V, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, M.Chathirapatti Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.54 of 2026) 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD).Nos.11806 & 11808 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR, J. TM ORDER IN CRL MP(MD).Nos.11806 & 11808 of 2026 in CRL OP(MD).No.9973 of 2026 Date : 29.06.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis