IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90438 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-970 Year-2025 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Nilu Kumari, wife of Sujeet Kumar Rai @ Sujeet Kumar, R/O Village- Manpura, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali 2. Sujeet Kumar Rai @ Sujeet Kumar, son of Shivshankar Rai, R/O Village- Manpura, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 19-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that due to land dispute these petitioners assaulted the informant and his wife with lathi, danda and iron rod resulting head injurie to the informant. It is further alleged that accused petitioner no. 2 snatched gold chain and jitiya from the informant’s wife and tried to outrage her modesty. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the parties are agnates and there is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioners are family members and there is general and omnibus allegation against both the petitioners. The allegation of snatching chain from the neck of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90438 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 informant is ornamental in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the bail petition. 6. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case that the injuries are simple in nature and there is case and counter case between the parties, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners is allowed. Let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 970 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. khushbu/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T