Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4591 (AP)

V.Meera Saheb v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/16839/2026 · 2026-06-28

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : ------ Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010320132026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 16839/2026 Between: 1. V.MEERA SAHEB, S/O SUBBAIAH AGE 45 YEARS, OCC F.P. SHOP DEALER FOR SHOP NO.0846012, KOTHAPALEM VILLAGE, (PHINAGANJAM MANDAL, BAPATIA DIST. -523135 ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST.-522503 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, BAPATIA DIST., AT BAPATIA.-522101 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA DIVISION, BAPATIA DIST., 523155 4. THE TAHSILDAR, CHINAGANJAM MANDAL, BAPATIA DIST.-523135 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction preferably writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 AND 4 in not releasing the Essential Commodities to the petitioner in respect of FP Shop FP Shop No.0846012, Kothapalem Village, Chinaganjam Mandal, Bapatia Dist., without any order of suspension or cancellation and without following the procedure as contemplated under AP State Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2018 apart from violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to release Essential Commodities in favour of the petitioner as usual and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the respondents 3 & 4 to release Essential Commodities to the FP Shop No.0846012, Kothapalem Village, Chinaganjam Mandal, Bapatia Dist., forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M M M SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ::ORDER :: Heard Sri M.M.M. Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vineeeth Appasani, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, appeared for the respondents. 2. The petitioner was appointed as a permanent dealer for Fair Price Shop bearing No.0846012 of Kothapalem Village, Chinaganjam Mandal, Bapatla District. The authorisation in respect of the above shop is valid up to 31.07.2027. The Civil Supply Revenue Inspector, Chinaganjam, along with staff, inspected the shop on 07.05.2026 at about 10.30 am and found certain variations. The authority conducted a panchanama vide Ex.P1 and furnished a copy of the same to respondent No.3 to initiate necessary action as per the Andhra Pradesh Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Order, 2018’). Thereafter, respondent No.3 issued a show-cause notice vide Rc.H/1535/2025, dated 16.05.2026 (Ex.P2). The petitioner submitted an explanation dated 30.05.2026 (Ex.P2). It seems some of the cardholders made a representation to Respondent No.3. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the authorisation of the petitioner was not suspended by respondent No.3; however, neither respondent No.3 nor respondent No.4 released commodities to the petitioner and allowed him to distribute the same to the cardholders. 4. Sri Vineeeth Appasani, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, appearing for the respondents, on instructions of respondent No.3 would submit that the authorisation of the petitioner has not been suspended so far. The Village Revenue Officer, Kothapalem (I/c) has been appointed as a Fair Price Shop dealer for the distribution of essential commodities to the cardholders. Since there was a transfer in the cadre of Deputy Collector, the proceedings initiated against the petitioner are pending. 5. Thus, as seen from the material available on record, no disciplinary action has been initiated against the petitioner so far in terms of the Order, 2018. In the absence of any order from the competent authority, the petitioner, being the authorised dealer, shall be allowed to continue to supply the commodities to the cardholders. 6. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, keeping the writ petition pending and inviting a counter-affidavit will not serve any purpose. Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of both the learned counsel appearing on either side, directing the respondents 3 & 4 to release the commodities to the petitioner and allow him to supply the same to the card holders in respect of Fair Price Shop bearing No.0846012 of Kothapalem Village, Chinaganjam Mandal, Bapatla District immediately. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 29.06.2026 TVN Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 6 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.16839 OF 2026 Date: 29.06.2026 TVN