- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5627 WP No. 1546 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.1546 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. MANJUNATH V.S. S/O LATE S. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT 'SRI MANJUANTHA NILAYA', VENKATESHWARA EXTENSION, SONUSHETTIHALLI, CHINTAMANI, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 563125. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SARAVANAN G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHINTHAMANI BRANCH (O7909), PCR COMPLEX, M.G. ROAD, CHINTHAMANI - 563 125. AND ALSO AT: STATE BANK OF INDIA, CHIEF MANAGER(CREDIT AND NPL), REP. BY THE AUTHORISED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER, SMT. MEGHA AGARWAL REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE-6, AO-3, BENGALURU NORTH NW-2, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 563125. 2. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA W/O LATE M. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5627 WP No. 1546 of 2022 3. SMT. BHAVANI V.S. W/O LATE M. VENKTESH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. 4. SMT. SUJATHA V.S. D/O LATE M.VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO. 2 TO 4 ARE R/AT 'SRI MANJUNATHA NILAYA', VENKATESHWARA EXTENSION, SONUSHETTIHALLI, CHINTAMANI, CHIKKABALLAPURA - 563 125. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 TO R4 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER DATED 06TH JANUARY, 2022 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHIKKABALLAPUR IN CRL.MISC.NO.3/2021 UNDER SECTION 14 THE OF SECURITIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTIONS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. B.S. Sachin, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 submits that the petitioner has not complied - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5627 WP No. 1546 of 2022 with the interim order dated 01st February, 2022 passed by this Court. 2. Having taken note of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1, petitioner is directed to approach the competent Tribunal for redressal of his grievance, if so desires. With this observation, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20