Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45891 (CAL)

SONALI KARAN AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/7324/2026 · 2026-09-29

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29.09.2026 Sl. No.29(DL) Ct. No.14 srm IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.A. No. 7324 of 2026 Sonali Karan & Ors. Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Sreyasree Choudhury …for the Petitioners Mr. Sourav Sengupta, Mr. Nripendra Pratap Singh …for the State. 1. Affidavits of service filed on behalf of the petitioners are taken on record. 2. By the present writ petition the petitioners seek direction upon the respondent authorities for disbursement of interest on delayed payment of gratuity and arrear pension amount from the date of death of the concerned employee till the date of actual payment at the rate of 18% per annum. 3. The petitioners contend that the deceased employee is the husband of the petitioner No.1, father of the petitioner Nos.2 and 3 and the son of the petitioner No.4. The concerned employee was an approved Head Teacher of Jugibandh Primary School, P.O. Gidhni, District-Jhargram, who died-in-harness on 8th January, 2024. The pension payment order was issued in favour of the petitioners on 14th August, 2025. The gratuity and arrear pension was disbursed in favour of the petitioners on 1st September, 2025. 2 However, no interest on the aforesaid amount has been paid in favour of the petitioners. Hence this writ petition. 4. Ms. Sreyasree Choudhury, learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that there is a delay in disbursement of the gratuity and arrear pension amount and as such the petitioners are entitled to receive interest on the delayed payment of gratuity and arrear pension amount. She seeks for appropriate orders. 5. Despite service, none appears on behalf of the State. 6. Mr. Sourav Sengupta, learned Advocate, who usually appears for the State, is requested to appear in this matter with a junior of his choice. Let appointment of the learned Advocates be regularised by the competent authority. 7. The learned Advocate for the petitioners is directed to hand over a copy of the writ petition along with its annexures to Mr. Sengupta, learned Advocate for the State. 8. Mr. Sengupta, learned Advocate for the State leaves the matter to the discretion of the Court. 9. From the aforesaid contentions made in the writ petition, it is found that there is considerable delay in disbursement of the gratuity and arrear pension amount. It is the bounden duty of the State to disburse all the pensionary benefits to the employee 3 forthwith, failing which the employee is entitled to interest on the aforesaid amount. 10. Accordingly, respondent No.2, the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West Bengal and respondent No.3, the Treasury Officer, Jhargram are directed to disburse the interest at the rate of @ 8% per annum on the gratuity and arrear of pension amount in favour of the petitioners by way of pensionary benefits from the date following the date of death of the concerned employee till the date of actual payment, to the extent of their entitlement and shares. Such payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. 11. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners is directed to communicate this order to respondent No.2, the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West Bengal and respondent No.3, the Treasury Officer, Jhargram, for necessary compliance. 12. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition being WPA 7324 of 2026 is disposed of. 13. Since no affidavit is called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have been denied. 14. Consequently, connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 15. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. 4 16. There shall be no order as to costs. 17. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)