Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4589 (CAL)

DUTI BALA MONDAL v. KALIPADA MONDAL

SA/551/1968 · 2026-02-27

Arindam Mukherjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27.02.2026 Court No.39 DL/Item No.-15 pp. In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side SA 551 of 1968 Duti Bala Mondal VS Kalipada Mondal Despite direction for service of administrative notice neither the appellant nor has the respondent appeared before the Court when the matter was called on for several times. On perusal of the note given by the Department, it appears that the administrative notices were dispatched to the appellant and the respondents at their addresses as stated in the cause title of the second appeal. The postal articles dispatched to the appellant and the respondents appear to have been received by them and no undelivered packet has been received back by the department. The service attempted on the recorded advocates has also been fruitless for insufficient particulars. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, as no one has turned up either to represent the appellant or respondents, though the matter has been appearing in the list, the matter is dismissed considering the fact that 2 with the passage of time no one is interested to either proceed or oppose the matter. Let the records of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court, if any, are lying in this Court, be returned to the appropriate Court with a copy of this order. (Arindam Mukherjee, J.)