Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4588 (RAJ)

SUBHASH SAINI S/O SHRI MOTI LAL SAINI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4457/2026 · 2026-04-09

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14904] 1HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4457/2026 Subhash Saini S/o Shri Moti Lal Saini, R/o Ward No. 06, New Sabji Mandi, Udaipurwati, Police Station Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Accused Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khedar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 09/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 29/2026 registered at Police Station Udaipur Wati, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Sections 61(2), 112(2), 66D & 318(4) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet is proposed to be filed; He further submits that petitioner is behind the bars since long. The main allegation is against the co-accused Amit Saini, Pankaj Saini and Manmohan. He further submits that he did not operate the account of co-accused for any transaction rather the money was deposited in the account of co-accused; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused; conclusion of trial may take a long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by [2026:RJ-JP:14904] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4457/2026] keeping the petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that petitioner is behind the bars since long; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Subhash Saini S/o Shri Moti Lal Saini is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st week of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. [2026:RJ-JP:14904] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4457/2026] 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/39