Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45877 (CAL)

DHANANJOY BISHAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/25971/2026 · 2026-10-01

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29. 29. 01.10.2026 (D/L) (D/L) CT. NO. 05 CT. NO. 05 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 25971 OF 2026 DHANANJOY BISHAL VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Nirmalendu Bera, Adv. Ms. Gopa Das, Adv. … For Petitioner Mr. Lokesh Singh, Adv. … For State 1. By presenting this writ petition prayer is made for registration of FIR based on complaint lodged by petitioner. It is submitted there is in-action on the part of the concerned police authority to take steps. 2. State respondents are represented by learned advocate. 3. There is an alternative remedy available to petitioner to approach jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 175(3) of BNSS, 2023 in the event complaint is not transformed into FIR. In this regard, reliance is placed on judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in (2007) 6 SCC 171 (Aleque Padamsee and others vs. Union of India and others). 4. Due to availability of alternative remedy, present writ petition is not entertained and same stands dismissed. 5. However, this order shall not preclude petitioner to approach jurisdictional Magistrate in pursuit of remedy. 6. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)