Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4587 (HP)

SUNIL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/6017/2026 · 2026-04-27

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:13629 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6017 of 2026 Decided on: 27.04.2026 Sh. Sunil Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Karam Pal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rajpal Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents-State. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is presently serving at GSSS Lahru, District Kangra, H.P. since 31.05.2025. His limited prayer is that in light of the fact that he is to superannuate on 30.09.2027, his request for adjustment at a station which is convenient to him, be looked into by the Authorities concerned. The petitioner is stated to have already filed a representation (Annexure P-7), through proper channel. 3. In light of the prayer made by the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with the direction representation (Annexure P-7) filed by the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of eight weeks from today in terms of the contents therein. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 2 7 , 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?