Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4587 (AP)

U. Ramesh, v. The municipal Commissioner,

WP/6912/2006 · 2026-07-05

Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading : 09.07.2026 APHC010334322006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3601] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI WRIT PETITION NO: 6912/2006 Between: 1. U. RAMESH,, S/O. RAMA RAJU, SCHOOL ASSISTANT ( ENGLISH), S.U.S. MUNICIPAL HIGH SCHOOL, BHEEMAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT,. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, BHEEMAVARAM MUNICIPALITY, BHEEMAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, W.G. DISTRICT, ELURU. 3. THE COMMISSIOENR 7 DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 4. S T K S E S K AYYANGAR, S.G.T. AR.K.R. MPL. HIGH SCHOOL, BHIMAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT. 5. N SUCHITHRA, SGT, PRESENTLY WORKING IN P.S.M. HIGH SCHOOL, BHIMAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 (RNT,J & PKC,J WP.NO.6912 OF 2006) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropirate writ, order or direction more particuarlly one in the natureof writ of Cetiorari calling for records in O.A.No.623 of 2004 on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal and set aside the order dt. 17.03.2006 in the said O.A. and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WVMP 1239 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 27-6-2006 passed in WPMP No.8883 of 2006 in W.P.No.6912/2006 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2006(WPMP 8883 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the rspondens not to revert the petitioenr from the post of School Assistant ( English), pending disposal of the W.P. and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. . 2. N PREMRAJ Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 2. GP FOR SERVICES II 3. K UDAYA SRI The Court made the following: 3 (RNT,J & PKC,J WP.NO.6912 OF 2006) ORDER :-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) Sri N. Prem Raj, learned counsel representing Sri Y.Chakradhara Raja, for the writ petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous, vide memo dated 28.04.2026. 2. Recording the submission as aforesaid, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. The interim order granted by this Court in W.V.M.P.No.1239 of 2006 on 27.09.2006 stands vacated. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J _____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI, J Date : 06.07.2026. RPD. Whether the order is : Speaking ✔ Yes/ No Reasoned ✔ Yes/ No Reportable ✔ Yes/ No Non-Reportable ✔ Yes/ No 4 (RNT,J & PKC,J WP.NO.6912 OF 2006) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI (DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS) WRIT PETITION NO: 6912 of 2006 Date: 06.07.2026 RPD. 5 (RNT,J & PKC,J WP.NO.6912 OF 2006)