1 / 2 Ct. No.1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.D/L.42 CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION Saikat APPELLATE SIDE Mukherjee WPA(P)/ 357 /202 6 SAIKAT DAS ]… Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ]… Respondents Appearance: Mr. Dwaipayan Banerjee with Mr. Aharnish Ghosh and Ms. Mahima Mukherjee, Advocates for the Petitioner Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, A.S.G. with Mr. Subrata Santra, Advocate for the Respondent- Union of India Mr. Koushik Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Santanu Singha, Mr. Sumalya Chakraborty and Mr. Amit Kumar Roy, for Respondent Nos.5-7 CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, CJ. & OM NARAYAN RAI, J. DATE : 30th September, 2026. 2 / 2 ]]] ORDER (Per Court) 1. Leave to delete Prayer Clause (c). Deletion be carried out forthwith. 2. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner. We find wild and reckless allegations being made without substantiation. 3. The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits on instructions that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this Petition. 4. In view of the above, this Petition is dismissed as withdrawn on instructions. 5. Needless to state, if the Petitioner prefers a PIL or any Petition, purportedly claiming to be in public interest, the locus of the Petitioner would be considered and the said issue is left open. (Om Narayan Rai, J.) (Ravindra V. Ghuge) Chief Justice