RAJKUMAR TYAGI S/O SHRI TULSIRAM TYAGI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3333/2026 · 2026-03-27
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4585 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4585 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12878] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3333/2026 Rajkumar Tyagi S/o Shri Tulsiram Tyagi, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Phoolpur, Police Station Mania, At Present Shivnagar Colony, Police Station Nihalganj Dholpur (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3752/2026 Harendra Urf Narendra Tyagi S/o Rambabu Tyagi, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Bichpuri, Police Station Diholi, Presently Residing At Ondela Road, Dholpur, Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur, Raj. (Presently Confined To District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain Mr. Vikram Sharma Mr. Kunal Agarwal For State For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Mohammad Shahid Hassan HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 27/03/2026
1. These bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 30/2026 registered at Police Station Nihalganj,
[2026:RJ-JP:12878] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3333/2026] District Dholpur, for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 109(1) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and the injuries sustained by the injured person are neither fatal nor dangerous to life. Learned counsel also submits that petitioner- Rajkumar Tyagi is in custody since 02.02.2026 and petitioner- Harendra Urf Narendra Tyagi is in custody since 01.02.2026 respectively. Learned counsel further submits that gun shot injury sustained by the injured is attributed to co-accused-Kamlesh. He submits that charge-sheet has already been filed and conclusion of trial may take long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners that charge-sheet has already been filed; petitioner- Rajkumar Tyagi is in custody since 02.02.2026 and petitioner-Harendra Urf Narendra Tyagi is in custody since 01.02.2026 respectively; gun shot injury sustained by the injured is attributed to co-accused-Kamlesh and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:12878] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3333/2026]
5. Therefore, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Rajkumar Tyagi S/o Shri Tulsiram Tyagi & Harendra Urf Narendra Tyagi S/o Rambabu Tyagi are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7.
In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA/55-56