Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45849 (PAT)

Raja Kumar @ Nand Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./90545/2025 · 2026-02-10

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90545 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2025 Thana- BANJARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Raja Kumar @ Nand Kumar Son of Binod Sahani R/o Chailahatal, P.S. - Banjariya, District - East Chamaparan, Motihari. 2. Aangad Kumar @ Anand Kumar Son of Binod Sahani R/o Chailahatal, P.S. - Banjariya, District - East Chamaparan, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP For the Informant : Ms. Akanksha Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 103(1), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S.. 3. At the outset, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that the same is not maintainable as proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. has already been issued. In this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90545 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 connection, reliance is placed upon recent judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Prem Shankar Prasad versus the State of Bihar and Another reported in LL 2021 SC 579. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. has already been issued against the petitioners and judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court rendered in the case of Prem Shankar Prasad (supra), the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T