Sugandh Kumar Gupta @ Sugandh Gupta @ Sugandh Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./90674/2025 · 2026-02-12
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45845 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45845 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90674 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-734 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East Champaran ======================================================
1. Sugandh Kumar Gupta @ Sugandh Gupta @ Sugandh Kumar son of Late Himachal Prasad R/V -Thakurbari, Ward no 11, Near Panchmandir, PS- Motihari Town District- East Champaran
2. Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Yadav son of Madan Ray Resident Of Village- Mohadipur, Ps- chiraiya, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 12-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Town P. S. Case No. 734 of 2025 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 121, 121(1), 122, 103(1), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per prosecution case, all the F.I.R. named accused persons assaulted the son of informant with knife, lathi as a result of which, he died during treatment.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. and their names transpired during course of investigation. There is no eye
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90674 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 witness to the occurrence. F.I.R. named accused persons have already been granted regular bail by this Courtvide order dated 02.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 82789 of 2025. Petitioner no. 1 is in custody since 15.10.2025 and petitioner no. 2 is in custody since 21.10.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation, period of custody and the fact that F.I.R. named accused persons have already been granted bail, the bail application is allowed. Let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail- bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Town P. S. Case No. 734 of 2025.
Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T