Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45845 (KAR)

SMT SUVASINI HEGDE v. CANARA BANK PREVIOUSLY SYNDICATE BANK

WP/1211/2022 · 2026-02-02

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5624 WP No.1211 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.1211 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. SUVASINI HEGDE S/O DINESH HEGDE, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT HERMUNDE GRAMA, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 574 101. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SANDHYA U. PRABHU, ADVOCATE) AND: CANARA BANK PREVIOUSLY SYNDICATE BANK REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, MUNIYALU BRANCH, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 574 108. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. LATHA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, UDUPI DISTRICT IN NO.TAX/CR.31/2019-E-46654 DATED 19TH AUGUST, 2019 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5624 WP No.1211 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Smt. Latha Shetty, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank submits that the lis between the parties is settled. 2. Submission is placed on record. 3. In view of the fact that the lis between the parties is settled, no further orders are required to be made in this writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19