Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45809 (PAT)

Md. Belal @ Velal Uddin v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./90753/2025 · 2026-01-15

Harish Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90753 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-497 Year-2025 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== 1. Md. Belal @ Velal Uddin Son of Sheikh Majalum @ Majalum Resident of village- Maheshpur, Ward No 1,/2, PS- Supaul District -Supaul 2. Md. Hannan son of Late Shekh Murtuja Resident of village- Maheshpur, Ward No 1,/2, PS- Supaul District -Supaul 3. Najmin Khatun @ Najni Khatun Daughter of Hannan @ Md. Hannan Resident of village- Maheshpur, Ward No 1,/2, PS- Supaul District -Supaul 4. Khusarati Khatun Wife of Md. Mintullah, D/o Belal Uddin, Resident of village- Maheshpur, Ward No 1,/2, PS- Supaul District -Supaul 5. Isarati Khatun Wife of Md. Khursid, D/o Belal Uddin, Resident of village- Maheshpur, Ward No 1,/2, PS- Supaul District -Supaul 6. Imarti @ Imarti Khatun Daughter of Belal Uddin @ Md. Belaluddin Resident of village- Maheshpur, Ward No 1,/2, PS- Supaul District -Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 15-01-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners and learned Advocate for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No.497 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 303(2) of the BNS, 2023. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90753 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/4 3. In the afternoon of the fateful day, while the informant was sitting at the shop of his co-villager, in the meanwhile, co-accused Md. Sohrab came in inebriated condition and started extorting money and when the same was refused, subsequently, all the accused persons by making unlawful assembly came there and started abusing and assaulting the informant and others. It is specifically alleged that petitioner no.1 inflicted a knife blow over the head of the informant and whereafter co-accused Md. Sohrab, who was holding a farsa on his hand assaulted the mother of the informant, due to which she sustained serious injury over her head and found to be grievous one. There is omnibus nature of allegation against other accused persons of causing assault, besides snatching of the valuables. 4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners taking this Court through the FIR contended that so far the allegation against the petitioner no.1 of causing assault to the informant is concerned, the same is found to be simple in nature. To support the aforesaid contention, the injury report has been placed on record. The injury which is sustained to the mother of the informant and found to be grievous one, is attributed to co- accused Md. Sohrab, who has already been taken into custody Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90753 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/4 and not before this Court. The parties are neighbour and on account of a trifle, they entered into a free fight, besides there is a counter version of the present case being Supaul P.S. Case No.506 of 2025, in which the persons of the petitioners’ side have also sustained injuries. The petitioners are the persons of fair antecedent and they undertake that they will fully cooperate in the proceedings of the Court. 5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that because of assault being made by the petitioners, mother of the informant has sustained grievous injury. 6. Having considered the submissions set forth by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the accusation levelled against the petitioners, besides the fact that the specific accusation has been attributed against co- accused Md. Sohrab, who is not before this Court as well as the fair antecedent of the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90753 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 4/4 connection with Supaul P.S. Case No.497 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners. rohit/- (Harish Kumar, J) U T