STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD v. RAJESHWAR PANDEY And ORS
WPC/1927/2008 · 2026-03-23
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4580 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4580 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:8004
--1--
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
W.P. (C.) No. 1927 of 2008
---- Steel Authority of India Ltd. a Government of India Company registered under S. 617 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its unit known as Bokaro Steel Plant at Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S.-Bokaro Steel City, Dist.-Bokaro through K.K. Mishra, S/o Sri Prabodh Mishra, A.G.M. Law I/c Resident of 4F, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Steel City, Dist.-Bokaro
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
1. Rajeshwar Pandey, S/o Late Sita Ram Pandey, R/o Plot No. 407, Co-operative Colony, B.S. City, Bokaro, Jharkhand
2. General Manager (Town Service), SAIL, Bokaro Steel Plant, Bokaro
3. The Dy. General Manager, I/C (Town Services) SAIL/BSL, Bokaro Steel Plant, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro.
.... Respondents
With
W.P. (C.) No. 3434 of 2008 ---- Steel Authority of India Ltd. a Government of India Company registered under S. 617 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its unit known as Bokaro Steel Plant at Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S.-Bokaro Steel City, Dist.-Bokaro through K.K. Mishra, S/o Sri Probodh Mishra, A.G.M. Law I/c Resident of Sector 4F, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Steel City, Dist.-Bokaro
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
1. Rajeshwar Pandey, S/o Late Sita Ram Pandey, R/o Plot No. 407, Co-operative Colony, B.S. City, Bokaro, Jharkhand
2. General Manager (Town Service), SAIL, Bokaro Steel Plant, Bokaro
3. The Dy. General Manager, I/C (Town Services) SAIL/BSL.
4. Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Ranchi
.... Respondents
---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Advocate
For the State
:- None
---- 06/23.03.2026 Mr. Bibhash Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instruction submits that these matters are of the year 2008 and in view of that he may kindly be allowed to withdraw these petitions with liberty to file afresh if the cause of action still
2026:JHHC:8004
--2--
survives
2. Nobody appeared on behalf of the respondents as yet in spite of the valid notice.
3. Accordingly, these petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 23.03.2026 Pawan/ Uploaded 25.03.2026