[2026:RJ-JP:13059] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 406/2026 Dinesh Gurjar @ Tiger S/o Dharampal, R/o Dhani Chabutara Ki Tan Ganwali, Police Station Dabla, District Sikar, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined At District Jail Sikar) ----Accused-Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent 2. Vijaydeep Meena S/o Dharampal Meena, R/o Dabla, Patan, District Sikar. ----Complainant/Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 277/2026 Vikash @ Vicky S/o Ramkumar Gurjar, R/o Ladi Ka Bas, Police Station Neemkathana Sadar District Sikar, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ---Respondent 2. Vijaydeep Meena S/o Dharampal Meena, R/o Dabla, Patan Dabla, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Complainant/Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Santosh Kumar Soni Mr. Vishal Kumar Mr. Shubham Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 28/03/2026 1. These criminal appeals have been filed on behalf of the accused-appellants under Section 14(A)(2) of S.C./S.T. [2026:RJ-JP:13059] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-406/2026] (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in connection with FIR No. 173/2025 registered at Police Station Dabla, District Sikar, for the offence(s) under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of BNS, under Sections 3, 25(6) of Arms Act and under Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have been falsely implicated in this case and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence. Learned counsel further submits that the appellants are in custody since 31.10.2025 and charge-sheet has already been filed in this matter. He further submits that the injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life; there are no criminal antecedents against the appellant Dinesh Gurjar @ Tigar and there are six other criminal antecedents instituted against the appellant Vikash @ Vicky in which he is already bailed out; trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the appellants in custody and, therefore, prays to enlarge the appellants on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellants hereinabove and submits that service is complete but no one has put appearance on behalf of the victim/complainant; there are six criminal antecedents against the accused-appellant Vikash @ Vicky. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the accused-appellants, the fact that charge-sheet has been filed in the matter; accused-appellants are behind the bars since 31.10.2025; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court [2026:RJ-JP:13059] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-406/2026] without commenting anything on merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellants on bail. 5. Consequently, these instant appeals are allowed. The impugned orders dated 7.02.2026 and 27.01.2026 passed by Special Court, SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Sikar in Criminal Bail Application CIS Nos. 112/2026 and 48/2026 respectively are set aside. It is ordered that the accused- appellants Dinesh Gurjar @ Tiger S/o Dharampal and Vikash @ Vicky S/o Ramkumar Gurjar are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the following conditions; (i) The accused-appellants shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The accused-appellants shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the law. (iii) The accused-appellants shall attend the hearing of the trial Court on the date fixed by the trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the accused-appellants shall be liable to be cancelled. 6. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI /10-11