113 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.22696 of 2026 Date of decision: 24.04.2026 Raj Kaur …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Rakesh Kumar Kachura, Advocate (joined through VC) for the petitioner. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) 1. This is a petition moved under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 482 Cr.P.C.) for directing respondents No.1 to 3 to take appropriate legal action against respondents No.4 to 7 and seeking further direction to the official respondents to decide the representation dated 12.03.2026 (Annexure P-1) submitted by the petitioner to respondent No.2. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 12.03.2026 (Annexure P-1), within a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Navraj S. Mahal, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 5. Without adverting to the merits of the case and in view of the NEETU RANI 2026.04.24 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD CRM-M No.22696 of 2026 -2- statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur, is directed to look into the representation dated 12.03.2026 (Annexure P-1) and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law. 6. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 7. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) 24.04.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.04.24 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD