CRL OP No. 16250 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 16250 of 2026 S Guna ..Petitioner Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police, Ulundurpet Police Station, Kallakurichi District. [Crime No.Not Known] ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of arrest in Crime No.Not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.S.Ajith For Respondent: Ms.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 126, 351(3), 109 BNS [294(b), 341, 506(ii), 307 of IPC] in Crime No.not Known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16250 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner stopped the defacto complainant’s vehicle and attacked him with deadly weapons. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has got seven previous cases. Hence, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given anxious consideration to the submission made by the learned Counsel on either side and perused the records available. 6. Taking into consideration that the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) has strongly opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner has got seven previous cases of similar nature which clearly demonstrate that the petitioner has misused the liberty and subverted https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16250 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 justice. Hence, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 29-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VEDA To 1.The Inspector of Police, Ulundurpet Police Station, Kallakurichi District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16250 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. VEDA CRL OP No. 16250 of 2026 29-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis