Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-18396-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.247 CRM-M-18396-2026 Decided on : 29.04.2026 Prakash ...... Petitioner
Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM :
*** Present : Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner.
***
, J (ORAL)
! "
# # $%$
&
'()"* +%$%$,
$%-&.-
.-!. "
& / *
0 $ !
+%$%$,( 0&
1
1
1
&
0
11
$%, 0 '() 2
&
0
MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.04.30 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
CRM-M-18396-2026 2
1
Learned counsel contends that mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act were not complied with at the time of alleged search and seizure. ( & &0
3 !
4 0 &
&
&
5
$+% $%$,
5)33++%3$%$, - 6 3 . &0 0
+%$%$, 7
0 8 & 0 &0
1
# 0 1 & & #
&
&7
& 1 2
1
# 7 &
0 &
& &0
00
&
However, she has not controverted the fact that the the petitioner is first time offender as he is not involved in any other case.
* 0 % 0 $8 8 3 & & & 5 8 0 8 8 & 0 0 # 0 1 & & MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.04.30 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-18396-2026 3 1 & 1 & $ 5 ( , ) 9 0 1 :& 65 # 0 && & 0 0 & $5 ( + ( 1 & 1 & & & & ; &
5 ; ;5< ( & 6 0 00 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No = & >? ;" MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.04.30 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh