Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4573 (HP)

RAMANUJAM ROYAL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION v. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND OTHERS

LPA/64/2026 · 2026-04-29

Bipin Chander Negi, Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA LPA No.64 of 2026 Decided on : _29.04.2026 Ramanujam Royal College of Education ... Appellant Versus National Council for Teacher Education and others …Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellant : Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.Nandan Vasishta, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Ms. Archana Dutt Advocate, for respondent No.3. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral) After arguing for some time, keeping in view the fact that in an earlier round of litigation in LPA No. 225 of 2024 titled as Ramanujam Royal College of Education vs. National Council for Teacher Education and others, permission had been granted on 22.12.2016 (Annexure P-4) to approach the authorities to file a fresh application as per the applicable rules within four weeks, which period was further extended on 3.8.2017 by filing a 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes -2- miscellaneous application, counsel is not in a position to press the present appeal. 2. The present appeal, in sum and substance, is a challenge to the order dated 7th August, 2024 passed by the appellate authority dismissing the appeal as time-barred, which arose from the order dated 23rd December, 2012 (Annexure P-3), being an order of withdrawal of recognition of the appellant institute which the learned Single Judge chose not to interfere in. Counsel further submits that he may be relegated to approach the competent authorities for the said recognition. 3. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the appellant to approach the competent authorities for the said recognition, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 29th April, 2026 Tarun Singh -3-