IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90644 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Pintu Kumar S/O Vijay Prasad Resident of Village- Kunj, P.S- Roh, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 13-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 338, 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 111, 317(2), 317(5), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) of the I.T. Act. 3. Prosecution case, in short, is that during raid by the Police in a cyber case, 08 mobile phones, passbook, ID, Aadhar, PAN card and ATM cards were recovered from the house of co- accused Kanhai Kumar. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the alleged recovery of mobile phones Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90644 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/2 and other documents have been made from the house of co- accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. He further submitted that other co-accused Kanhai Kumar has been granted privilege of bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 06.01.2026 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 88584 of 2025. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 15.08.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 134 of 2025. manish/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T