CRWP-338 IN 114 PUNEET K STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA 1. Constitutio official resp at the han representati 2. submitted 22.03.2026 (Annexure but the sam thereon. H satisfied if Superintend representati 3383-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG EET KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus TE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS AM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE **** Mr. Vicky Kishor, Advocate an Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Advocat Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG, ISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been titution of India seeking issuance of a ial respondents No.2 to 3 to protect the e hands of respondents No.4 to sentation dated 22.03.2026 (Annexure At the very outset, learned itted that the petitioners have rec 2026 before the Senior Superintende exure P-7) raising their grievances as he same has not yet been considere on. He further submitted that at this fied if appropriate directions are iss ntendent of Police, SAS Nagar (M sentation filed by the petitioners and ta (1) F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH CRWP-3383 of 2026 Date of Decision: 27.03.2026 ...Petitione ersus ...Responden ICE MANISHA BATRA cate and ate for the petitioners AAG, Punjab s been filed under Article 226 of th ce of a writ of mandamus directing th tect the life and liberty of the petitione to 7 and to take action on the nexure P-7). arned counsel for the petitioners ha e recently filed a representation o ntendent of Police, SAS Nagar (Mohal ces as mentioned in the present petitio sidered and no action has been take at this stage, the petitioners would b re issued to respondent No.2- Senio gar (Mohali) to decide the aforesa and take necessary action thereon. .2026 titioners ondents of the ting the titioners n their ers has tion on Mohali) petition n taken ould be Senior foresaid AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.27 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-338 3. 4. behalf of th due course. the course o 5. commentin disposed of aforesaid re within a p accordance petitioners, order to pro 27.03.2026 Amit Sharma Whe Whet 3383-2026 -2- Notice of motion. Mr. Roshandeep Singh, AAG lf of the respondents-State and submit course. Let a complete set of the pape ourse of the day. In view of the limited prayer enting anything on the merits of t sed of at this stage with a direction t said representation dated 22.03.2026 in a period of 15 days from today, ce with law. Needless to say, ioners, the official respondents would p r to protect their life and liberty. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye , AAG, Punjab, has advance notice submits that the needful will be done e paperbook be supplied to him durin rayer made by the petitioners, witho ts of the case, the present petition ction to respondent No. 2 to decide th .2026 (Annexure P-7) of the petitione oday, by passing a speaking order say, if any threat is found to th ould provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No otice on done in during without tition is cide the titioners order in to the curity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.27 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.