Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45699 (KAR)

SMT. MAHADEVAMMA v. BHARATH. B. N.

WP/738/2026 · 2026-01-12

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1762 WP No. 738 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 738 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MAHADEVAMMA W/O LATE PUTTASANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT-85 YEARS, 2. SANGAMESHA T. P. S/O LATE PUTTASANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT-50 YEARS, 3. PUTTEGOWDA T. P. S/O LATE PUTTASANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT-48 YEARS, 4. SURESHA T. P. S/O LATE PUTTASANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT-46 YEARS, 5. DHARANESHA, S/O LATE PUTTASANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT-44 YEARS, 6. SMT.MANJULA, D/O LATE PUTTASANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT-41 YEARS, PETITIONERS 1 TO 6 ARE R/AT THAMMADIHALLI VILLAGE, GULURU HOBALI, TUMAKURU TQ, TUMAKURU DIST. 7. SMT.PREMA, D/O LATE PUTTASANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT-34 YEARS, W/O RAMESH, Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1762 WP No. 738 of 2026 R/AT JANGAMARAHALLI, AGALIMANDALA, MADAKSIRA TQ, ANANTHAPURA DIST, A.P.STATE …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PARASHURAM R. HATTARAKIHAL, ADVOCATE) AND: BHARATH B. N. S/O B. V. NARASIMHAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT-37 YEARS, R/AT V.A.1101 EAST, PURVA VENEZIA APARTMENTS, MAJOR SANDEEP UNNIKRISHNAN ROAD, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU – 64. …RESPONDENT THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 03.01.2026 PASSED ON IA NO. 3 FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF/ RESPONDENT U/S 151 OF CPC FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ORDER OF T.I ON IA NO. 2 IN OS NO. 688/2024 PASSED BY THE PRL. CJ TUMAKURU AS PER ANNX-A TO THIS PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioners seek the following reliefs: a) Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari and quash the impugned order dated 03.01.2026 passed on I.A.No.3 filed by the plaintiff/respondent u/s 151 of CPC for implementation of order of T.I. on I.A.No.2 in O.S.No.688/2024 passed by the Prl.C.J., Tumakuru, as per Annexure-A to this petition, and; - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1762 WP No. 738 of 2026 b) Grant such other appropriate order/orders as deem fit by this Hon’ble Court to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. 2. 2. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits petition may be disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to request the First Appellate Court to pass appropriate orders in M.A.No.74/2025, which presently stands posted to 14.01.2026. 3. The aforesaid submission is placed on record. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to request the First Appellate Court to pass appropriate orders on I.A.Nos.1 and 2 filed by the petitioners-appellants in the said appeal in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 3 Sl No.: 2