Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45695 (MAD)

Senthilkumar v. The State Rep by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/17556/2026 · 2026-07-08

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 17556 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 17556 of 2026 Senthilkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, AWPS, Namakkal, Crime No.11 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.11 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Krishnamoorthy For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Criminal Side ) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 7 r/w 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, in Crime No.11 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is aged approximately sixty-four years. It is alleged that the petitioner misbehaved with the minor victim when she was alone at her home. Hence the case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17556 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been in custody since 21.05.2026. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate for investigation. He further stated that the petitioner is a senior citizen. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4.At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police produced the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS and he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 6.On perusal of the statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS statement, this Court finds that there was some inappropriate behaviour on the part of the petitioner. However, considering the age of the petitioner and the fact that he has been incarcerated since 21.05.2026, this Court is of the firm view that his further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17556 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Fast Track Mahila Court, Namakkal, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent daily morning at 10.30 a.m. for a period of fifteen days; thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17556 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 08-07-2026 ep Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1.Fast Track Mahila Court, Namakkal. 2.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Salem. 3.The Inspector of Police, AWPS, Namakkal, 4.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. CRL OP No. 17556 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis