- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3198 RSA No. 29 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2025 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI SHAKIL AGE 55 YEARS, S/O LATE S.M. SHAFI, R/AT NO.1, NANDIDURGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 046, …APPELLANT (BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR D M., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI SYED RAFIC AHMED AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS S/O LATE ABDUL REHMAN, R/A NO.7, MUNISHAMAPPA LAYOUT, ST. THOMAS TOWN, LINGARAJPURA, BENGALURU- 560 084. 2. SRI. MUKUNDA, MAJOR, S/O LATE G.K. MURTHY R/AT C/O SUNITHA GOPALAN, NO.12, 1ST CROSS, SHANKARAPURAM, BENGALURU -560 004. 3. SRI GHOUSIA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, W/O LATE MOHAMMED ASLAM Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3198 RSA No. 29 of 2025 4. ZAMEER TAJ, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, W/O ABDUK FAIROZ, 5. SYED DADA PEER, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O LATE SYED MEHBOOB SAB, 6. SYED ROUSHAN AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, S/O LATE SYED MEHBOOB SAB, ALL ARE R/O NO.245, MASJID ROAD, 5TH CROSS, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU 560 064. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.12.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.55/2018 ON THE FILE OF IX ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU., ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.09.2017 PASSED IN OS NO.2579/2006 ON THE FILE OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3198 RSA No. 29 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 82