- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1214 WP No. 396 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.396 OF 2026 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: MR. GANESH POOJARY S/O. LINGAPPA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO-1-108, KARYAMBETTU, HERMUNDE POST AND VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-574101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMANNA K.P., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VISHWAS, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. CHAITHRA @ POOJARY CHAITHRA KRISHNA GULABI, D/O. KRISHNA B POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT SRI, KRISHNA NILAYA, Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1214 WP No. 396 of 2026 KOMBAGUDDE, JYOTHI NAGARA, MARNE VILLAGE, AJEKAR POST, KARKALA TALUK, UDUPI DIST-574101. …RESPONDENT (V/C/O DATED 09.01.2026, NOTICE TO RESPONDENT IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 18.12.2025 PASSED IN MC NO.53/2025 ON IA NO. 1/25 FILED UNDER SECTION 151 CPC AND IA NO. 2/2025 FILED UNDER SECTIONS 148 AND 151 CPC BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA, UDUPI DISTRICT, PRODUCED AT ANNX-A, AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW IA NO. 1/2025 AND IA NO. 2/2025 (ANNXE-C AND D). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1214 WP No. 396 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Heard Sri.Somanna.K.P who represents Sri.Vishwas learned counsel on record for the petitioner. 2. In the light of the limited relief sought for, this Court is of the view that notice to respondent can be dispensed with. Therefore, notice to respondent is dispensed with. 3. Being aggrieved by the orders passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Karkala on I.A.No.1/2025 and I.A.No.2/2025 dated 18.02.2025 in M.C.No.53/2025, the present writ petition is filed. 4. On hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and upon perusal of the relevant material that is brought on record, it is clear that the respondent herein filed a petition seeking decree of divorce against the respondent. The respondent though entered into appearance on receipt of notice, failed to file his counter statement. Therefore, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1214 WP No. 396 of 2026 the Court took the counter statement as nil and posted the case for the evidence of respondent herein. On that the petitioner filed I.A.No.1 to reopen the case and I.A.No.2 seeking permission to file his objection. Both the applications stood dismissed through the impugned order. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter revolves upon the marital relationship between the parties and in case the petitioner's counter statement is not accepted, he would be put to irreparable hardship and loss. Learned counsel further submits that due to ill- health the petitioner could not file his counter statement within time. 6. As the case revolves upon the marital relationship between the parties and as this Court is of the view that a fair opportunity is required to be granted to the petitioner herein to project his version through the counter statement, considers desirable to give a fair opportunity to do so. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1214 WP No. 396 of 2026 7. Therefore, the writ petition is allowed. The impugned orders are set aside. The respondent shall file his counter statement/objections before the trial Court on or before 14.01.2026 and also deposit costs of ₹10,000/- to be payable to the respondent i.e., the petitioner in the MC. In case the conditions imposed are not complied, this writ petition shall be deemed to be dismissed. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE DS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6