Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45649 (MAD)

D.V.Srinivasan v. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police

CRL OP/17447/2026 · 2026-07-07

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 17447 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 17447 of 2026 1. D.V.Srinivasan S/o. Venkatesan, No.44, Mulki Street, Arani, Tiruvallur-601 101. 2. Srilatha S W/o. D.V.Srinivasan, No.44, Mulki Street, Arani, Tiruvallur-601 101. 3. Vidhyalakshmi S D/o. D.V.Srinivasan, No.44 Mulki Street, Arani, Tiruvallur-601 101 4. Deepak Rahul D.S D/o. D.V.Srinivasan, No.44 Mulki Street, Arani, Tiruvallur-601 101 5. Parimala V W/o. Venkatesalu, No.44 Mulki Street, Arani, Tiruvallur-601 101 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police Tiruvallur District. 2. The State or Tamil Nadu Represented by the Inspector of Police C3-Arani Police Station, Tiruvallur - 601 101. Crime NO. 43 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17447 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS ,2023 to pass an order of Direction, direction the Principal District and Sessions Judge (Special Court No. 43 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent and to consider and pass orders on the Petitioners bail application on the same day of their surrender on such terms and conditions and thus render Justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.H.Dani Jeshwanth For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran, Counsel for Government of Tamil NAdu ORDER The petitioner is an accused in Cr. No.43 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b),351(2) of BNS and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989(the Act) 2. In view thereof, the petitioner has prayed that his bail application be considered on the same day. Considering the provisions of the Act, the allegations and factual background, I am of the view that the prayer can be considered. However, the hearing of the bail application shall take place with due notice to the de facto complainant. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17447 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 3. Considering the above and the totality of the circumstances, the following directions are issued: (i) The petitioner shall serve advance notice of the surrender petition/bail application on the prosecution as well as the de-facto complainant, intimating the proposed date of surrender; (ii) The respondent police shall also independently inform the de-facto complainant about the surrender and the hearing of the bail petition, including the date and the Court; (iii)The petitioner shall surrender, and the bail application shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law on the same day. 4. With the above directions, this criminal original petition is disposed of. 07-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No SMN To. 1. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Tiruvallur District. 2. The Inspector of Police C3-Arani Police Station,Tiruvallur - 601 101. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17447 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17447 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. SMN CRL OP No. 17447 of 2026 07-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis