Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4564 (CAL)

NIRMAL KUMAR PAUL AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(P)/8/2026 · 2026-01-14

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.01.2026 Item No.47 Ct. No.1 KS W.P.A. (P) 8 of 2026 Nirmal Kumar Paul & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Dipjyoti Chakraborty Mr. S. Paul …..For the Petitioners Mr. Jahar Lal De, Ld. A.G.P. Mr. Shamim Ul Bari …..For the State PER, SUJOY PAUL, ACJ.: 1. Parties are represented through their respective learned counsels. 2. Counsel for petitioners prayed for a relief, which as per petitioners’ counsel is covered by order of this Court dated 07.02.2025 passed in W.P.A. (P) 28 of 2025 (Annexure “P-9” of the writ petition). 3. Counsel for petitioners submits that this order has not been complied with. If an order is holding field and is not complied with, the filing of another writ petition is not the remedy. The remedy is elsewhere. Since, the petitioners are praying for similar relief, which is already taken care of in order dated 07.02.2025 in W.P.A. (P) 28 of 2025, we find no reason to entertain this PIL. 2 4. Accordingly, PIL is disposed of by reserving liberty to file appropriate proceedings. 5. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities. (SUJOY PAUL, ACJ.) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)