Md. Navab Ansari @ Md. Nawad Ansari v. The State of Bihar
CWJC/264/2026 · 2026-01-19
Purnendu Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45632 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45632 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.264 of 2026 ====================================================== Md. Navab Ansari @ Md. Nawad Ansari Son of Late Choti Miyan Chotu Ansari, resident of Village and P.O.- Chor Dargah, P.S. Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Sheikhpura.
2. The District Magistrate, Sheikhpura.
3. The Additional Collector Magistrate Sheikhpura, District-Sheikhpura.
4. The Circle Officer Ariyari, District-Sheikhpura.
5. Md. Ghulam, Son of Late Choti Miyan, resident of Village-Dargah, P.S. Ariyari, District-Sheikhpura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : AC to Standing Counsel (25) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 19-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned AC to SC 25 for the State.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to make correction in the cause title of present writ petition in respect of the address of the petitioner, in course of the day.
3. Learned counsel is permitted do so.
4. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought inter alia the following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:-
“i. For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of ceritorari for quashing the order dated 29.11.2025 passed in jamabandi cancellation appeal No 80/2025-26 passed by respondent district magistrate
Patna High Court CWJC No.264 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 sheikhpura, whereby and whereunder respondent district magistrate has been pleased to dismiss the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 7.01.2025 passed by respondent additional collector cum additional district magistrate sheikhpura in jamabandi cancellation case no 2 of 2020. ii further issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order date 7.01.2025 passed in jamabandi cancellation case no 2 of 2020 passed by respondent additional district magistrate sheikhpura whereby and where under respondent ADM has been pleased to cancel the jamabandi No 676/2 and allow the cancellation case no 20/2020. iii further for issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authority to sustain the jamabandi No -676/2 created in favour of petitioner. iv Further for issuance of an appropriate any other writ/wits, order/ orders. direction/directions for which petitioner shall be found entitled under the fact and circumstances of the case as stated below.”
5. Considering the reliefs, as sought for in the present application, the petitioner, if so advised, may file a representation before the Commissioner, Munger Division for redressal of his grievances and the Commissioner, Munger Division is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law.
6. Accordingly, the present application stands
disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
Ashishsingh/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U