CRL OP No. 16292 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 16292 of 2026 1. Asikali 2. Eliyaas ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police P-5, M.K.B. Nagar Police Station, Chennai. ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS Act, 2023, pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in the event of arrest in connection with crime No. Not known of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police For Petitioner(s): Mr.Gokul C For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Palanivel Government Advocate (Criminal side) ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 316 (2), 318 (4) of BNS, in Crime No.Not known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16292 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners run a Tours and Travels company named “Fine Yatra Tours and Travels” located in Avadi. It is alleged that the defacto-complainant approached the petitioners to arrange for a trip to Thailand for twenty nine members. For this purpose, the defacto- complainant paid a total sum of Rs.12,20,000/- which included commission charges and flight tickets. Unfortunately, the defacto-complainant could not submit the proper passports and other documents, resulting in the cancellation of the trip. However, the petitioners had not repaid the remaining balance amount. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and are ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the first petitioner has one previous case against him. Hence, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. 5.From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), it is pellucid that the first petitioner has misused the liberty https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16292 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 granted by this Court at an earlier point of time. Hence, this is not a fit case to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 29-06-2026 ep To 1.The Inspector of Police P-5, M.K.B. Nagar Police Station, Chennai. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16292 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. EP CRL OP No. 16292 of 2026 29-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis