SRI. C. M. AHMED PASHA v. M/S. ROOPA SHOPPING ARCADE
MFA/1033/2018 · 2026-01-27
Jyoti M
Original Suitbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45630 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 45630 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4284 MFA No. 1033 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1033 OF 2018 (CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. C.M. AHMED PASHA S/O LATE MOHAMMED ISHAQ SAHEB AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO.50/1, GOVINDCHETTY COLONY QUEEN'S ROAD BENGALURU-560 051
2.
SRI. K. JAYAPAL S/O G. KRISHNAN AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT 302, YAMANOTHRI APARTMENT OPP. VEERANJANEYA TEMPLE GM PLAYA BENGALURU-560 075
3.
SRI. MUNIRAJU S/O PACHYAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.50/1, GOVINDCHETTY COLONY QUEEN'S ROAD BENGALURU-560 051
…APPELLANTS (BY SRI. A. KUMARAVEL, ADVOCATE) AND:
M/S. ROOPA SHOPPING ARCADE HAVING ITS OFFICE NO.1-A
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4284 MFA No. 1033 of 2018
NEW NO.119, M.G.ROAD BENGALURU REPRESENTED BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER M/S. GERDIE CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT NO.11, HMG AMBASSADOR 137, RESIDENCY ROAD BENGALURU-560 025 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR GAURAV DUGAR S/O LATE SURESHMULL DUGAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VENKATESH P. DALWAI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE,
1908.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
The appeal is filed to set aside the
order dated:10.01.2018 passed by the XXVII Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengaluru on I.A.No.1 in O.S.No.6717/2017.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4284 MFA No. 1033 of 2018
2. The Registry concerned has furnished the E-court status of O.S.No.6717/2017. A perusal of the same depicts that the suit has been disposed on 06.08.2019. Because of disposal of the main suit itself, the appeal does not survives for
consideration.
3. Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34