No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C-528 No. 199 of 2026 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. D.P. Mittal, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present Criminal Misc. Application under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed by the applicant challenging the order dated 17.04.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Appeal No. 105 of 2025, Teeka Ram Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others, pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar and also the impugned recovery citation dated 16.01.2026 issued by the respondent no. 2/Tehsildar, whereby, the applicant has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 5,50,000/- in accordance with the order dated 19.03.2025 passed by learned 5th Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)/Additional CJM, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Complaint Case No. 7296 of 2019, Abdul Wahid Vs. Teeka Ram, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the learned Judicial Magistrate, without application of mind, has passed the order dated 19.03.2025 in Criminal Complaint Case No. 7296 of 2019, Abdul Wahid Vs. Teeka Ram, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the evidence collected was placed before the learned court below, which, after applying its judicial mind, has rightly convicted the applicant to face trial under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 7. Perusal of the impugned orders dated 19.03.2025 passed in Criminal Complaint Case No. 7296 of 2019 and also the order dated 17.04.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Appeal No. 105 of 2025 reveal that the courts concerned have considered & discussed all relevant aspects. Thus, the view taken by both the court concerned cannot be faulted. 8. The applicant, without complying the order dated 17.04.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Appeal No. 105 of 2025, has challenged the said order before this Court by filing the present criminal misc. application under Section 528 of BNSS. Thus, the order of recovery citation dated 16.01.2026 has rightly been passed by respondent no. 2/Tehsildar, whereby, the applicant has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 5,50,000/-. 9. No good ground has been shown by the applicant as to what is the infirmity or illegality in the impugned orders. Hence, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned orders. 10. Accordingly, the criminal misc. application fails and is hereby dismissed. (Alok Mahra J.) 16.02.2026 Ujjwal