Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 456 (PNJ)

HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD. v. CHHOTE LAL AND ORS.

FAO/3893/2010 · 2026-01-13

Vikram Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD. CHHOTE LAL AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- VIKRAM AGGARWAL 1. despite the case having been called twice. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the present 2. of. 13.01.2026 himanshu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-3893-2010 Date of Decision: HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD. Versus CHHOTE LAL AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL None for the appellant. Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.(Oral) No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant despite the case having been called twice. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the present Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, (VIKRAM AGGARWAL Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.01.2026 HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD. …Appellant …Respondents VIKRAM AGGARWAL Insurance Company. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant despite the case having been called twice. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the present appeal. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE HIMANSHU 2026.01.14 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document