HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD. v. CHHOTE LAL AND ORS.
FAO/3893/2010 · 2026-01-13
Vikram Aggarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 456 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 456 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD.
CHHOTE LAL AND ORS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present:-
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
1.
despite the case having been called twice. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the present
2.
of.
13.01.2026 himanshu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-3893-2010 Date of Decision:
HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD.
Versus
CHHOTE LAL AND ORS.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL
None for the appellant.
Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate
for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.(Oral)
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant despite the case having been called twice. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the present
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
Pending application(s), if any, (VIKRAM AGGARWAL Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.01.2026 HARYANA VIDYUT PARSARAN NIGAM LTD.
…Appellant
…Respondents VIKRAM AGGARWAL Insurance Company. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant despite the case having been called twice. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing the present appeal.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
JUDGE
HIMANSHU 2026.01.14 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document