MD ISHAB ALI @ MD ESHAB ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
Bail Appln./4118/2025 · 2026-01-20
Rajesh Mazumdar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 456 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 456 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010284582025
2026:GAU-AS:674
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./4118/2025 MD ISHAB ALI @ MD ESHAB ALI S/O. MAJIBUR RAHMAN, R/O. VILL.- NO. 2, ISLAMPUR, P/O. ISLAMGAON, P/S. BIHPURIA, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN-787054 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:MD. TOMIR UDDIN S/O. LT. HUSSAIN ALI R/O. VILL. PHUKANDOLONI P/O. KOLAKHOWA P/S. LALUK DIST. LAKHIMPUR ASSAM PIN-78702 Advocate for the Petitioner : ALHAJJ I UDDIN, MRS. ROMA ENGTIPI,MR ROBIUL HOQUE,MRS. R MOMTAZ Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 21-01-2026 Mr. A. I. Uddin, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to misconception and miscommunication between the petitioner and the counsels appointed, including the counsels appointed by the DSLC, although a petition was pending before the learned Trial Court, this petition had been filed. He fairly submits that this petition does not need adjudication at this point of time and he prays that he may be allowed to pursue the bail petition filed before the learned Trial Court. Although this Court does not appreciate the manner in which this bail petition was filed, accepting the statement that it was on the basis of miscommunication, this bail petition is closed as not pressed, allowing the petitioner to continue to pursue the bail petition filed before the learned Trial Court without prejudice to the closure of this bail petition. JUDGE Comparing Assistant