Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45589 (KAR)

A CHINNAPPA @ CHINNAPPA v. SRI S SUDEESH

MFA/533/2018 · 2026-01-27

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4214 MFA No. 533 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 533 OF 2018 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. A. CHINNAPPA @ CHINNAPPA S/O LATE ANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS DEAD BY LR'S APPELLANT NOS.2 TO 5 2. SMT. SHASHIKA W/O A. CHINNAPPA @ CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 3. SMT. BHAGYAMMA D/O A. CHINNAPPA @ CHANNAPPA W/O UMESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 4. SRI. C. MANJUNATH S/O CHINNAPPA @ CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 5. SRI. VISHWANATH S/O CHINNAPPA @ CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT AVALAHALLI VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-560 064 …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. SOWMYA R, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4214 MFA No. 533 of 2018 AND: 1. SRI. S. SUDEESH S/O B. SRINIVASAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDENT OF 45A NEW BEL ROAD, DEVASANDRA BENGALURU-560 054 2. SRI. S. ABHIRAMAIAH S/O B. SRINIVASAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESIDENT OF 45A NEW BEL ROAD, DEVASANDRA BENGALURU-560 054 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. BALAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S. VASANTH MADHAV, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND ALSO FOR R2) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.K.Balakrishna., counsel on behalf of Sri.S.Vasanth Madhav., for caveator/ respondents has appeared through video conferencing and submits that the lis between the parties has been resolved by way of compromise petition before the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4214 MFA No. 533 of 2018 Trial Court. Counsel, therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made on behalf of the respondents is placed on record. 2. The captioned appeal is filed to set aside the common order dated:06.12.2017 passed by the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru on I.A.Nos.1 and 2 in O.S.No.1076/2017. 3. The Registry concerned has furnished the E-court status of O.S.No.1076/2017. A perusal of the same depicts that the suit has been disposed on 11.01.2024. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in the captioned appeal. 4. Resultantly, the appeal is disposed of. Because of disposal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33