Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4558 (HP)

THE BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER-CUM-CHAIRMAN v. KRISHNA DEVI

CWP/3390/2025 · 2026-05-04

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ( 2026:HHC:14290 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3389/2025 a/w CWP Nos. 3390 & 3424/2025 Decided on: 04.05.2026 1. CWP No. 3389/2025 The Block Medical Officer-cum- Chairman, Executive Committee , Rogi Kalyan Samiti …..Petitioner Versus Pinki Devi .....Respondent 2. CWP No. 3390/2025 The Block Medical Officer-cum- Chairman, Executive Committee , Rogi Kalyan Samiti …..Petitioner Versus Krishna Devi .....Respondent 3. CWP No. 3424/2025 The Block Medical Officer-cum- Chairman, Executive Committee , Rogi Kalyan Samiti …..Petitioner Versus Shakuntla Devi .....Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Uday Singh Banyal, Advocate. For the Respondent(s): Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate vice Mr. Tek Chand, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Awards in question in these petitions are almost similar, passed by learned Labour Court-cum- 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 ( 2026:HHC:14290 ) Industrial Tribunal, Kangra at Dharamshala and involve almost similar questions of facts and law. Under the impugned awards, the petitioner had been directed to reinstate the respondents- workmen on similar posts and on similar basis w.e.f. their respective dates of retrenchment with further direction to pay compensation to them in the sum of ₹50,000/- towards back wages. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that these writ petitions are squarely covered by the decision rendered in The Block Medical Officer-cum- Chairman versus Shakuntla Devi.2 The operative part of the decision is as under:- “5. For the foregoing reasons, no interference is called for with the impugned awards. All these writ petitions, therefore, lack merit and are accordingly dismissed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.” Following the ratio of above decision, the present writ petitions are also dismissed affirming the awards under challenge. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 04, 2026 Judge yogesh 2CWP No.3242/2025, decided on 28,04.2026 a/w connected matters.