Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4558 (AP)

MS GSK Estructural India Pvt.Ltd v. Sri Peeyush Kumar IAS

CC/4175/2025 · 2026-07-02

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 08.07.2026 APHC010696522025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4175/2025 Between: 1. MS GSK ESTRUCTURAL INDIA PVT.LTD, REPT. BY ITS PROPRIETOR G. ANIL KUMAR, S/O RAM MOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCCU CONTRACTOR, FLAT NO 304, SAI BALARAM RESIDENCY, SR NAGAR COLONY, BENZ CIRCLE, JYOTHI MAHAL BACKSIDE, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. (R-2) 2. SRI DHYANACHANDRA H M IAS, WORKING AS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. (R-3) 3. SMT G SAMRAJYAM, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-ILL O/O MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA. VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. (R-4) ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may 2 be pleased to pleased to summon the respondents herein, and punish them for willful, deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Honble court in W.P.No.23993 of 2025, dt.09.09.2025, under section 10 to 12 of the Contemptof Courts Act, 1971, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GNANESWARA RAO MITTIREDDI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 2. KOTHARU VIJAYESWARI The Court made the following: 3 Order:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.23993 of 2025, dated 09.09.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 03.07.2026 PNS Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑