- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3216 RP No. 12 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REVIEW PETITION NO. 12 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE DODDAMARAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS M.P. PAPAMMA @ GANGAMMA, W/O LATE MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS M.R. RAVI KUMAR, S/O LATE MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT: NO.30, 3RD CROSS, V.R. ROAD, RAMAMUTHY NAGAR, BENGALURU-560016. 2. M.R. RAJESHWARI D/O LATE MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT: NO.105, 17TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010. 3. M.R. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT: NO.19/3, NEW BINNAMANGALA, INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU-560005. 4. M.R. MURALIDHAR S/O LATE MUNIRAJU Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3216 RP No. 12 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT: NO.19/3, NEW BINNAMANGALA, INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU-560005. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA SRIVATSA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. VARADARAJAN M.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. MUNIYAMMA, W/O LATE M. THIMMAIAH, SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS. SRI. LAVA S/O SMT. MUNIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT: NEW BINNAMANGALA, NO.9/B-20, OLD MADRAS ROAD, KOLAR ROAD, POST INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560038. SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS 1(A). SMT. MUNIRATHNA W/O. LATE LAVA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 1(B). SMT. SHILPA D/O. LATE LAVA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 1(C). SRI. PRABHU S/O. LATE LAVA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO. 1(A) TO 1(C) ARE R/AT: NEW BINNAMANGALA, NO. 9/B-20, OLD MADRAS ROAD, KOLAR ROAD, POST INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 038. 2. SRI KUSHA S/O SMT. MUNIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 3. SRI BASAVARAJ S/O SMT. MUNIYAMMA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3216 RP No. 12 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT:NEW BINNAMANGALA, NO.9/B-20, OLD MADRAS ROAD, KOLAR ROAD, POST INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560038. SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS AMENDED V.C.O. DATED:27.10.2025 3(A). NIRMALA W/O. LATE BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 3(B). DIPIKA D/O. LATE BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 3.3. PRAJWAL S/O. LATE BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.3(A) TO (C) ARE R/AT: NO. 151, NERIGA VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, NEAR BY GRAMA PANCHAYATH ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE - 561125. 4. SMT. MALA D/O SMT MUNIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 5. SMT. RANGAMMA D/O SMT.MUNIYAMMA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.2, 4 AND 5 R/AT: NEW BINNAMANGALA, NO.9/B-20, OLD MADRAS ROAD, KOLAR ROAD, POST INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560038. 6. SMT. KASTURI W/O BALAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 7. SRI UMASHANKAR S/O DODDAMARAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3216 RP No. 12 of 2024 8. SRI RAMARAJU S/O SRI DODAMARAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 9. SRI DODDATHIMMAIAH S/O SRI MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, 10. SRI M.BASAPPA S/O SRI MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, 11. SRI VIJAYAKUMAR S/O SRI. M. BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS RESPONDENTS NOS.6 TO 11 ARE R/AT: NEW BINNAMANGALA, OLD MADRAS ROAD / KOLAR ROAD, POST INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560038. 12. SRI VENKATARAJU S/O DODDAMARAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT KADUGODI COLONY, KADUGODI POST, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE-560067. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PRADEEP NAIK K., ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2, R4, R5 AND R1(A TO C) AND R3(A TO C); V/O. DATED 10.09.2025 PETITION AGAINST R6 TO R12 IS DELETED) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W. ORDER XLVII RULE 1 THE C.P.C. PRAYING THAT, THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.01.2023 PASSED IN R.F.A. NO.90/2008 AND ALLOW THE SAID RFA AS PRAYED FOR, BY ALLOWING THIS REVIEW PETITION WITH COSTS THROUGHOUT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3216 RP No. 12 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Heard Sri Raghavendra Srivatsa, learned Senior Counsel for Sri Varadarajan M.S., learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Pradeep Naik K., learned counsel for respondents. 2. This Court while passing the order in Regular First Appeal No.90/2008 has noted that there is no documentary evidence placed on record to show that the suit property is part of Sy.No.134 of Binnamangala Village. But there are material documents available in that regard on record. Therefore, the judgment dated 06.01.2023 needs to be set aside by allowing the review petition. 3. Said aspect of the matter is not disputed by the counsel for respondents. 4. Accordingly, following order is passed. ORDER i. Review petition is allowed. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3216 RP No. 12 of 2024 ii. Consequently, judgment dated 06.01.2023 in Regular First Appeal No.90/2008 is hereby recalled. iii. Regular First Appeal No.90/2008 is restored to the file and the office is directed to post the matter before the roster bench. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CLK LIST NO.: 19 SL NO.: 5