Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 45549 (CAL)

SUBHENDU ADHIKARI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/14798/2024 · 2026-09-29

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01. 01. 29.09.2026 (D/L) (D/L) CT. NO. 05 CT. NO. 05 (ARPAN-A.R.CT.) In The High Court at Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 14798 OF 2024 (CAN 3 OF 2026) SUVENDU ADHIKARI VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS …………… Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. Sagnika Banerjee, Adv. Ms. Megha Datta, Adv. Mr. Tamoghna Pramanick, Adv. Ms. Sarmistha Basak, Adv. … For Petitioner Mr. Partha Chakraborty, Adv. Ms. Sneha Chatterjee, Adv. …For State 1. Matter is accommodated in today’s list under the heading “Extension of Interim Order” on being mentioned by learned advocate representing petitioner. 2. Matter is heard in presence of learned advocates representing petitioner and State respondents. 3. On behalf of State respondents one communication dated 29th September, 2026 of Officer-in-Charge, Kolaghat Police Station, Purba Medinipur is filed today and same is taken on record. Copy of the said communication dated 29th September, 2026 is made over to learned advocate representing petitioner. 4. It is disclosed in the said communication that on the date of alleged occurrence of event Model Code of Conduct was in force in connection with Parliamentary Election, 2024. Based on information received by police authorities, raid and search was conducted at the house of one Gopinath Ghorai under the jurisdiction of Kolaghat Police Station but during search no [2] incriminating article was found and accordingly, a nil search list was prepared. 5. In view of disclosure of these facts vide communication dated 29th September, 2026, Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, learned advocate representing petitioner submits that writ petition is not pressed. 6. In view of such submission made on behalf of petitioner, writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. Connected application, if any, also stands dismissed. 7. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)