2026:HHC:14133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4578 of 2026 Decided on: 28.04.2026 Vikas Saklani … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General handed over instructions dated 27.04.2026, which are taken on record. In terms of these instructions, the Court stands informed that in terms of the representation received from the petitioner, the matter was fixed for 22.04.2026, on which date the petitioner was called upon for personal hearing. However, the petitioner did not appear in person and communicated vide e-mail. dated 21.04.2026 that the matter be decided on the basis of documents available on record. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that now some more time be granted to take appropriate call on the representation of the petitioner. 2. As prayed for, let needful be done on the representation of the petitioner within three weeks from today and in case the petitioner is still aggrieved by the order passed by the Authority, he may approach the Court afresh. The petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 2 8 , 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?